Sources
Introduction
Prologue
Chapter 01
Chapter 02
Chapter 03
Chapter 04
Chapter 05
Chapter 06
Chapter 07
Chapter 08
Chapter 09
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
Chapter 17
Chapter 18
Chapter 19
Chapter 20
Chapter 21
Chapter 22
Chapter 23
Chapter 24
Chapter 25
Chapter 26
Chapter 27
Chapter 28
Chapter 29
Chapter 30
Chapter 31
Chapter 32
Chapter 33
Chapter 34
Chapter 35
Chapter 36
Chapter 37
Chapter 38
Chapter 39
Chapter 40
Chapter 41
Chapter 42
Chapter 43
Chapter 44
Chapter 45
Chapter 46
Chapter 47
Chapter 48
Chapter 49
Chapter 50
Chapter 51
Chapter 52
Chapter 53
Chapter 54
Chapter 55
Chapter 56
Chapter 57
Chapter 58
Chapter 59
Chapter 60
Chapter 61
Chapter 62
Chapter 63
Chapter 64
Chapter 65
Chapter 66
Chapter 67
Chapter 68
Chapter 69
Chapter 70
Chapter 71
Chapter 72
Chapter 73
Chapter 74
Chapter 75
Chapter 76
Chapter 77
Chapter 78
Chapter 79
Chapter 80
Chapter 81
Chapter 82
Chapter 83
Chapter 84
Chapter 85
Chapter 86
Chapter 87
Chapter 88

 
TAZARA ... a journey by rail through world-history © KJS / 2009
Research on Nobel Laureates Nienburg's Albert-Schweitzer-School
CHAPTER 56



PUPIL 1:
When Albert Schweitzer had done his day’s work, he usually would play on his piano with organ-pedal that had been built for use under tropical conditions. He would practise for his compilations of Bach-compositions that were sold as recordings and also for his public concerts, which earned money for his charitable engagement.
His organ-teacher made him to compile a complete collection of notes of Bach’s compositions for organ; and in 1908, he published a Bach-monograph that is seen, until today, as the standard work of music-aesthetical approach …

PUPIL 2:
… Bach’s „Art of the Fugue“ is the late work of the Leipzig Thomas-Cantor that is surrounded by a lot of legends. After Bach died in 1750, it was almost forgotten. However, in the second half of last century an author had the idea to combine for his book’s title the name of the composer and musical theorist Bach with two areas of complete different human thinking and feeling — with the mathematics of Kurt Gödel and with the paintings of Marits Cornelis Escher ...

PUPIL 3:
… All three had created something which is able to deceive human senses, something that would continue from a beginning until it arrives again at that point of beginning — a movement in an endless loop.
Escher, for example, painted objects or buildings which, on first sight, look natural but then appear as impossible constructions …
We are not talking here about the normally impossible move of our school-building from a German town to an African railway-platform; this seems — as shown by your and our presence at this location — to have been quite possible for the controller of this TAZARA-game … We are talking about Escher’s graphs of impossible perspectives, of optical delusions and other phenomena of perception …

His painting „Waterfall“ for example shows a stream of water that moves away from the observer, then turns to the left, is then falling down only to connect to its beginning. What seems to work on this painting in two dimensions would be not possible in the reality of three dimensions because the water had to flow uphill. His painting „Steps up and down“ shows, in a similar way, a staircase on which people move endlessly around …

Again, it is not an image of the staircase leading up to our „Giebelsaal“! However, pay attention, since we are working with multi media-applications, there are shortcuts into a virtual world as well — into the World Wide Web …

PUPIL 2:
The already mentioned bestseller-author researched as physicist and information scientist with regard to the „endless loop“ — as appearing in the works of Gödel, Escher and Bach — the question, how it was possible that out of relatively „dull“ elements — for example the neutrons in the human brain — intelligent systems could grow with the capability of self-reflection …
The author himself, Douglas Richard Hofstadter, is, so to speak, noble material: he was born as son of the NOBEL PHYSICS LAUREATE Robert Hofstadter and since the 1980s he is representing a scientific school that expects much of the creating of „artificial intelligence.

„GÖDEL, ESCHER, BACH: AN ETERNAL GOLDEN BRAID“
The book by Douglas R. Hofstadter, Klett-Cotta, 2006, 17th edition)


… What is it about?

It is not only about mathematics, not at all only about music or art. The book is dealing with many different areas, it does not only have a brief look at them but offers perceptions from a wider variety of scientific areas thereby trying to answer some of the most important questions:

How is the „I“, the self, coming into being?
How can consciousness develop out of unconscious matter?
What is this creation of the „I“ and how was it possible that it could emerge from matter? …


Category: „dull“ particle in GDR-brain:

On an East-German tramway, a musician is reading a score. An agent of state-security thinks this score may contain cipher writing and arrests the man as a spy although the musician claims it is a fugue of Bach. Next day, an interrogator shouts at him: „Now you tell me! You can confess; Bach did already!“

PUPIL 1:
Tonight, here in our „Giebelsaal“ of the Albert-Schweitzer-School in Nienburg at the river Weser you are introduced to:

SCHWEITZER, KISSINGER, ANNAN: AN ETERNAL GOLDEN BRAID

… What is it about?

It is not only about charity, not only about diplomacy and not at all about peace or war. Our working group is dealing this evening with many different areas, it does not only have a brief look at them but offers perceptions from a wider variety of scientific areas thereby trying to answer some of the most important questions:

How did the „I“ of Albert Schweitzer, of Henry Kissinger, of Kofi Annan come into being?
How did the consciousness of the NOBEL PEACE LAUREATES emerge?
Out of what matter did it develop?

Albert Schweitzer was a reputed organ-player, a musical scientist, a theorist of organ building and one of the most important interpreters of the music of Johann Sebastian Bach.

PUPIL 2:
However, for that he was not awarded the NOBEL PRIZE!

The keynote of Schweitzer's personal philosophy, which he considered to be his greatest contribution to mankind, was the idea of ‚Reverence for Life‘. He wrote:
„True philosophy must start from the most immediate and comprehensive fact of consciousness, and this may be formulated as follows: ‚I am life which wills to live, and I exist in the midst of life which wills to live‘.“ In nature, one form of life must always prey upon another. However, human consciousness holds an awareness of, and sympathy for, the will of other beings to live. An ethical human strives to escape from this contradiction so far as possible. Though we cannot perfect the endeavour, we should strive for it: the will-to-live constantly renews itself, for it is both an evolutionary necessity and a spiritual phenomenon. Life and love are rooted in this same principle, in a personal spiritual relationship to the universe. Ethics themselves proceed from the need to respect the wish of other beings to exist as one does towards oneself.“

PUPIL 1:
However, for that he was not awarded the NOBEL PRIZE!

Many friends and well-known scientists, headed by his friend Albert Einstein who died on the 18th of April 1957, urged Schweitzer to protest in public against nuclear bombs and the atomic tests. Renowned scientists had the idea that the reputation of Albert Schweitzer could help to awaken the public to the problem of nuclear pollution and the consequent danger to human beings. Schweitzer didn't feel called upon to do this. He had always refused to comment on political problems or to take up a position in favour of one party or another. But after the first hydrogen bomb test in 1954, he began to make an intense study of the political and scientific aspects of the nuclear tests and the military implications. In January 1957 the well-known publisher Norman Cousins visited Albert Schweitzer together with the photographer Clara Urquhart in Lambaréné. Together they hoped to be able to persuade Albert Schweitzer that he must commit himself against the nuclear bomb. He hesitated about his competence in the nuclear question and doubted seriously whether a statement from him would have any influence. Then Schweitzer wrote a letter to the American President Dwight Eisenhower: „In my heart I carry the hope I may somehow be able to contribute to the peace of the world. This I know has always been our deepest wish. We both share the conviction that humanity must find a way to control the weapons which now menace the very existence of life on earth. May it be given to us both to see the day when the world’s people will realize that the fate of all humanity is now at stake, and that it is urgently necessary to make the bold decisions that can deal adequately with the agonizing situation in which the world now finds itself.“

PUPIL 2:
However, for that he was not awarded the NOBEL PRIZE!
Albert Schweitzer received the NOBEL PRIZE thanks to his image coined by the world media as the „good doctor of Lambaréné“.


German version available on DVD!
Audio presentation by the pointsman, animation & video-clips!
Acces RBO's web-shop by clicking on the radio!
 
Continue TAZARA-Index
Correct the Pointsman

web page hit counter

web page hit counter