|
"They use their
money to buy us!"
African participant, Rev. Stephen Domelevo, Catholic
Digest TV Productions / Ghana
Corridor-talk!
Another African participant declared corridor-talk as the
most interesting experience during this conference:
Eric Chinje from Cameroon, Program Manager, Global Media
Program, The World Bank Institute.
In his power-point-presentation, Eric Chinje summarized
the "Donor Approach to Media in Africa" as
follows:
>
Evidenced outcomes do not reflect annual
investment in media development
> Media as an instrument (used when needed;
avoided when possible)
> Uncoordinated, agenda-driven, issue-specific
interventions
> Too much focus on media for "governance
& accountability" &
ooNOT enough on media
for "improved development outcomes"
> Absence of sector-wide solutions
> inattention to matters of sustainibility |
Nice
observation, said corridor-talk, but where is the World
Bank Institute's initiative leading to? According to Eric
Chinje:
>
Greater coordination in all aspects of sector
support
> Holistic, multi-donor approaches
(holistic
= emphasizing the organic or functional relation
between parts and the whole)
> Engagement with Media Owners
> Support for Media Monitoring & Audience
Measurement
> Attention to Funding Mechanisms |
Eric
Chinje's overall goal, as brought forward by him on
behalf of the World Bank Institute:
| ... to
help to grow a coalition from individuals and
organizations in a crowded, disconnected field
... |
In other
words: Media Development Cooperation needs guidance, even
steering; this seems to have been the conference's major
message.
But guidance and steering by whom?
No player in the field of media development cooperation
will deny that their business is dependent on donors
& sponsors without money no media development
cooperation. But, can dependence on agendas of such
donors & sponsors be denied as well? Is it deniable
that, more and more, such agendas establish the driving
force for media development cooperation in the Southern
world?
Elsewhere on my Internet-presentation, I
picked a particular example: Canada-based "Farm
Radio International" which supports, in its own
words, some 300 broadcasters in 39 African countries
recieves for its work financial aid from the "Melinda
& Bill Gates-Foundation".
In RBO's "Grumbler's Corner", I forwarded the
question: " ... to what extend the necessary
debate is in safe hands with a broadcasting organisation
which receives funds from a GMO-promoting foundation
...".
This is the background of the Gates-GMO-initiative in
Africa:
A new
Philanthro-Capitalist Alliance in Africa?
AGRA The Return of the Green
Revolution
Galés Gabirondo
2008-03-31
(http://pambazuka.org/en/category/features/47017)
(excerpt) ... Whether or not AGRA can successfully bring
the new Green Revolution to Africa, and whether or not
the Green Revolution will benefit the poor as much as it
benefits the capitalists being courted by the Gates
Foundation are two different questions that should be
open to public debate. Unfortunately, there was never a
public debate on AGRA.
There are many productive agroecological farming systems
in Africa that do not depend on GMOs or other Green
Revolution technologies, but these alternatives were
never considered. Whether or not AGRA can re-start the
Green Revolution in Africa is yet to be seen. What is
clear thus far is that it has been successful in
eliminating competition for the control of African food
systems.
AGRAs philanthro-capitalism draws the worlds
attention away from local alternatives and towards global
market-based solutions that ultimately favor
those with more international market power, i.e., the
seed and chemical monopolies. Though it strengthens
corporate opportunities and power, it does nothing to
address the weakened ministerial and regulatory capacity
of the state, ignores the need to protect local markets
or ensure a greater market share of the value chain for
farmers. It elides land issues and does not address the
eroding economic and environmental resiliency of African
food systems. Worse, it diverts attention away from the
role that the global markets play in creating hunger and
poverty in Africa in the first place. Can AGRA actually
solve these problems? Not without addressing their
causes.
So, why was it
for the corridor-talk not a surprise to be
introduced on Schloss Eichholz to the Worl Bank supported
"Media Map Project" which tries to measure
"the impact of media development worldwide".
However, their worldwide view seems somehow limited to
Southern countries which stand for Northern
anti-terror-worries: Pakistan, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan
...
And then, it was almost escaping the corridor-talk's
attention: Major-sponsor of the mapping-project is?
Yes, the "Melinda & Bill
Gates-Foundation"!
see also: THE ISSUE AT HAND
... und auf
Deutsch: Bertelsmanns journalistischer
Brückenkopf, oder: Was afrikanische Journalisten
wirklich brauchen
| REACTIONS & VIEWPOINTS |
|
11.11.2010
Interessanter Rückblick von Simon Haslock,
Albany Associates:
"Writing in a special report for the United
States Institute of Peace, Simon Haselock,
co-founder of Albany Associates, charts the
results of taking a grassroots
approach to communications in conflicts around
the world. Drawing conclusions for today's
mission in Afghanistan, he identifies political
and peacemaking achievements over the past two
decades in Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq and Darfur borne
out of local participation, strong media
regulation and the process of "letting
go" by the international community.!
"Make it theirs: the imperative of local
ownership in communications and media
initiatives" is attached and can be found
at: www.usip.org/publications/make-it-theirs
Gruss,
Klaas Glenewinkel
media in cooperation & transition
Klaas Glenewinkel, Managing Director
klaas@mict-international.org
mobile ++49 151 504 234 55
mict gGmbH, brunnenstrasse 9 / 10119 berlin /
germany
phone ++49 30 484 9302 16 / fax ++49 30 690 88
390
www.mict-international.org
09.11.2010
Flirting with fiction
In the BBC-series
of viewpoints from African journalists, filmmaker
and columnist Farai Sevenzo considers African
story-telling and the reporting of the continent
in an age of cuts.
"... Our reportage has been taken over by
the humanitarians, by the United Nations
missions, by the star journalists flying in from
London or Washington or Doha on reporting
holidays; and the stories that we may want to
hear, can now be found by word of mouth only
..." http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-11719993
|
|